In College Football 25 Pipeline is very important and determines whether we can recruit more talent in the game. Through Pipeline schools are able to build strong relationships with coaches and players in order to attract more top players. Below this College Football 25 Pipeline Rankings List will list players with 3-5 stars available for recruiting.
Each T5 within a pipeline penalized its rating by 1%, each T4 penalized its rating by 0.8%, each T3 0.6%, each T2 0.4%, and each T1 0.2%. The sum of all the pipelines, weighted by tier, becomes the "congestion penalty.
Pipeline | T5 | T4 | T3 | T2 | T1 | Total | Congestion Penalty |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 2 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 15 | 47 | 18.6% |
Pacific Northwest | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 26 | 9.6% |
Arizona | - | - | 3 | 14 | 13 | 30 | 10% |
Arkansas | - | 1 | - | 4 | 7 | 12 | 3.8% |
Northem Califoria | - | 1 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 31 | 11.6% |
Southen California | 4 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 52 | 25.4% |
Colorado | - | - | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | 3.8% |
New England | - | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 19 | 6% |
Tidewater | 5 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 15 | 52 | 23.8% |
North Florida | - | - | 2 | 9 | 24 | 35 | 9.6% |
South Florida | 4 | 2 | 8 | 21 | 31 | 66 | 25% |
Central Florida | 6 | 2 | 11 | 30 | 30 | 79 | 32.2% |
Metro Atlanta | 2 | 5 | 7 | 37 | 28 | 79 | 30.6% |
South Georgia | 2 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 36 | 28 | 18.2% |
Hawaii | - | - | 1 | 5 | 9 | 15 | 4.4% |
Big Sky | - | - | - | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1.2% |
Illinois | - | 1 | 6 | 9 | 17 | 33 | 11.4% |
Indiana | - | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 19 | 6.2% |
lowa | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 2.8% |
Kansas | - | - | 1 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 2.8% |
Kentucky | - | 1 | - | 5 | 5 | 11 | 3.8% |
Louisiana | 1 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 24 | 44 | 15.2% |
Michigan | 1 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 15 | 34 | 12.6% |
Minnesota | - | - | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 2.6% |
Mississippi | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 18 | 7.6% |
Missouri | - | 1 | 1 | 10 | 14 | 26 | 8.2% |
Nebraska | - | - | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 1.8% |
Nevada | - | - | 1 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 5.4% |
Big Apple | 1 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 36 | 13.2% |
New Mexico | - | - | - | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1.2% |
North Carolina | 3 | - | 9 | 7 | 18 | 37 | 14.8% |
Ohio | 2 | 1 | 8 | 15 | 17 | 43 | 17% |
Oklahoma | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 5.4% |
Pennsylvania | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 23 | 37 | 11.6% |
South Carolina | 2 | - | - | 12 | 18 | 32 | 10.4% |
Tennessee | 1 | - | 5 | 15 | 29 | 50 | 15.8% |
Southwest Texas | - | - | 3 | 2 | 14 | 19 | 5.4% |
East Texas | 4 | 4 | 9 | 32 | 20 | 69 | 29.4% |
North Texas | 4 | 5 | 6 | 36 | 21 | 72 | 30.2% |
Utah | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 17 | 5.6% |
West Virginia | - | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1.8% |
Wisconsin | - | 1 | - | 2 | 5 | 8 | 2.6% |
The biggest winners and losers from this update:
Team | Base Rating | Base Rank | Zenkei Rating | Zenkei Rank | Difference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rice | 4.97 | 38 | 3.686 | 28 | -15 |
UCF | 4.699 | 48 | 3.501 | 63 | -15 |
Kansas State | 3.724 | 86 | 2.758 | 99 | -13 |
Army | 5.212 | 34 | 3.786 | 46 | -12 |
Illinois | 4.849 | 44 | 3.663 | 55 | -11 |
FAU | 4.115 | 68 | 3.071 | 79 | -11 |
North Texas | 3.757 | 83 | 2.829 | 94 | -11 |
West Virginia | 4.916 | 40 | 3.751 | 50 | -10 |
Pittsburgh | 5.243 | 33 | 4.063 | 42 | -9 |
Missouri | 5.173 | 35 | 4.012 | 44 | -9 |
winners:
Team | Base Rating | Base Rank | Zenkei Rating | Zenkei Rank | Difference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cincinnati | 3.775 | 82 | 3.780 | 47 | 35 |
UCLA | 4.257 | 62 | 4.272 | 36 | 26 |
San Diego St. | 3.662 | 95 | 3.184 | 70 | 25 |
USC | 4.673 | 51 | 4.554 | 31 | 20 |
Washington | 4.358 | 57 | 4.265 | 37 | 20 |
Rutgers | 4.679 | 50 | 4.526 | 32 | 18 |
Wisconsin | 3.784 | 80 | 3.289 | 66 | 14 |
Baylor | 4.779 | 46 | 4.503 | 33 | 13 |
California | 4.519 | 56 | 4.033 | 43 | 13 |
Southern Miss | 3.482 | 102 | 2.879 | 89 | 13 |